On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:11:06 -0500, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:58:11 -0800 (PST), "
wrote:

On Monday, February 15, 2021 at 4:04:50 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:48:42 -0800 (PST), "
wrote:

On Monday, February 15, 2021 at 3:33:39 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:05:11 -0800 (PST), "
wrote:

On Monday, February 15, 2021 at 2:53:34 PM UTC-5, Bill wrote:
Wayne B wrote:

There's no question that pipelines are the safest and most cost
effective way of transporting crude oil. I thought it was a
disappointing, bad decision. On the other hand if that was the cost
of getting Trump out of office, maybe it was worth it. I don't want
my grandchildren growing up in a dictator led banana republic,
supported by a cult of racist crazies.

Then why are you supporting Nancy and her ilk?

He seemingly wants his grandchildren to grow up in a socialist society where everyone picks their preferred pronoun, they all have free healthcare but no one has a job since all the businesses have been regulated out of the country, and everyone is under austerity measures and are rioting in the streets. But he's got his and can just cruise down to the islands and live happily ever after with all the rest of the rich liberals.
===

If the Republican party could snap out of their present love affair
with criminal Trump I'd be happy to have a moderate, conservative
president.

If the media and the Democrats could have snapped out of their blind hatred of Trump, and instead of continuously attacking him before he even took office they had tried to work with him, the last 4 years could have been much different.

Besides, the county had to choose between him and criminal Hillary. They chose wisely.
===

I agree that Hillary was a bad choice but I don't think she would have
tried to set herself up as queen for life. And we already know that
she didn't try to steal the election after she lost.

Yeah, she and the DNC tried to cheat and steal the election while it was in progress. Fed her the debate questions in advance, etc.

"queen (POTUS) for life"? Neither did Trump. Hyperbole much?

I believe Trump (rightfully so) questioned the fairness of the election. We now know (Time magazine article) that powerful forces were working to tilt the election away from Trump in Biden's favor, including some very questionable and possibly unconstitutional changes in key swing state's election laws. It was already suspected. I believe we have just had the most contrived and tilted elections that have ever witnessed, and the chicanery came from the liberal side in an all-out effort to make sure he wasn't re-elected.

He made a lot of noise, but in the end I don't believe there is any way he would have tried to declare himself the winner to become king for life. Anyone that *really* believes that is as crazy as the tiny percentage of his supporters that are truly rabid. He, like everyone else, knows that a small group of agents would simply go to the WH and escort him away. Surely you realize that to be the reality?

===

Trump started saying months in advance that he would not accept the
election results if the vote went against him. That's one thing he
didn't lie about.

So what? Do you think his nonacceptance would have kept him in the White House?

Ridiculous. This isn't Ethiopa.
--

Freedom Isn't Free!