On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:51:03 -0500, Wayne B
wrote:

On Wed, 03 Feb 2021 18:22:19 -0500, John wrote:

The liberals have stated over and over that he was killed by a protestor who hit
him in the head with a fire extinguisher. Yet, no marks have been shown on his
head, and the autopsy is being withheld. Why?

CNN, however, may have let the cat out of the bag:

"In Sicknick's case, it's still not known publicly what caused him to collapse
the night of the insurrection. Findings from a medical examiner's review have
not yet been released and authorities have not made any announcements about that
ongoing process.

According to one law enforcement official, medical examiners did not find signs
that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma, so investigators believe that
early reports that he was fatally struck by a fire extinguisher are not true."

Better look at the link quickly. CNN has been know to remove stories quickly:

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/02/polit...ges/index.html

===

It's still there.

It may be irrelevant whether or not he was struck. There is plenty of
legal precedent for charging perpetrators with murder even if a crime
victim dies of a heart attack during a struggle.

He didn't die during a struggle. He collapsed in his office.

Moreover, the website ProPublica offered a different explanation.

It quoted Ken Sicknick, whom the site identified as the late officer’s brother,
as saying that Brian Sicknick had communicated with his family and never
mentioned a fire extinguisher attack.

Sure makes one wonder hew the liberal media came up with their accusations.
--

Freedom Isn't Free!