Regarding covid-19 isolation versus open up the country arguments
here's a solution:

First, it should be considered that the general public has been
well informed and warned about the highly contagious nature of
the covid-19 virus. It's still not completely understood but
much has been learned over the past 3-4 months.

It's understandable that there's a growing sentiment to relax
federal recommendations and local government restrictions on
business closures, etc., and to address the economic crisis.


So, for those who are arguing for self-determination as to what
they are allowed to do, here's a suggestion.

Do what you want. If you want to take the precaution of
limiting your exposure to others, do so.

If you want to start living a more "normal" life and
expose yourself to groups and crowds ... restaurants,
theaters, bars, etc. .... do so, but at your own risk.

If you choose to exercise your rights to "open" the
country and you end up getting sick, the government
will pay to have you tested for covid-19. If you test
negative, your insurance or medicare will kick in for
treatment of whatever your ailment is.

If you test positive however, you are on your own.
No state or federal money will be spent to save your
ass.

It's called being responsible for your actions.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com