On 4/19/2020 11:56 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 11:13:23 AM UTC-4, Tim wrote:
Evidently, while some can’t comtrol their liquor, others can’t control their finances...

John H
- hide quoted text -
On Saturday, 18 April 2020 14:25:25 UTC-4, Tim wrote:
I wonder if now he’ll take a temporary absence for a while? He usually does...


On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 09:11:48 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:
- show quoted text -
===

Wow indeed. I'm surprised that 'Airry is able to get financing on
anything. What a trail of debris he has left behind him. I guess
P.T. Barnum was right.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

Well, he took an absence from this thread, that's for sure!

Strange stuff. He brags as if he's fairly well off, but the MD court records show a state and a federal lien for taxes, and now this lawsuit from a payday type lender. And that's in addition to all the Florida stuff.

Maybe the lady of the house has him on an allowance, he had to finance a purchase, and found he couldn't make the payments? Something's not quite right.



I've only been sued once in my life. It was back in 1981 when I was 32
years old.

A small group of us left the company we were working for to start a
new company. The owner of the business we left filed a lawsuit
against the new company and against all the principles individually
which included me. I was only a 5% "sweat equity" owner (didn't
have any money to invest) but still qualified as a principle.

His claim was that we "stole" technology.
He had to eventually drop the suit because it was proven that
although a related business, the technology we were engaged in
and offering had nothing to do with his business, present or past.
He knew that but being a vindictive type, he was just trying to
tie us up in legal fees, depositions, etc., to harass us.

Part of his suit was to place a lien on our houses. It turned out
that I was the only one at risk because Mrs.E. and I were listed
as "Joint Tennants" on the deed meaning that each of us had
an equal share in the house ownership. Her "half" couldn't be
touched in the lawsuit but my "half" could.

It should have been recorded as "Tenants by the Entirety". This means
that both spouses own 100% of the house
and even if he had prevailed in the suit, he still couldn't
touch it with a lien, etc.

We changed the deed shortly after the suit was dropped.