View Single Post
  #79   Report Post  
Harry Krause
 
Posts: n/a
Default Anectdotal Evidence for Harry...

BOB wrote:


I don't think your old Bayliner is better, nor would I head out in six
to eight foot waves in my 36' boat, and it is built to take that kind of
stuff. What I think is that you are no brighter than another Bayliner
owner who used to post here and who claimed he took on 30' waves in his
22' Bayliner


Harry, are you that dense to banter back and forth for so long, yet miss
the point of this entire argument? You repeatedly have implied or
directly said that all Bayliners are crap.


No, I have not. I don't recall ever saying or implying that. I think
Bayliners are perfectly suitable for protected waters, such as, for
example, Chesapeake Bay, where I do a lot of boating. But I wouldn't go
out in the ocean out of sight of shore in one, nor would I run any of my
favorite (and by that I mean treacherous) ocean inlets in a Bayliner,
any Bayliner.


(You can dispute the
implication all you want, but anyone who will do a google search with
the keywords "Harry Krause Bayliner Wellcraft Chris-Craft Sea Ray" will
have far more negative comments than positive comments, with the vast
majority of those comments directed at Bayliner, affirming you bigoted
actions)


Which means squat, Bob. Really.


I have repeatedly told you I take exception to these comments
you and others so quickly hand out as a mattter of fact.


Take all the exception you want, Bob. Makes no difference to me.


However, you Mr. Krause, among others, are more inclined to answer a
question like "I just bought a new Bayliner besides the mandated USCG
equipment, what other stuff should i get" The most common reply would
be something along the lines of: "A new boat.", a smart ass comment
based solely on the word Bayliner. Not your words per se, but your
general behavior to be sure.



Hey, Bob...you are entitled to your opinion, no matter how far from
reality it is. Go for it, eh?


The repeated and unprovoked bashing of the Bayliner name, by yourself
and others, whenever it comes up in this group implies that all Bayliner
are crap no matter what environment there in and no mattter what boat
they are compared to. This begs the question: How can these
Bayliner implications be true if I and others have been able to
repeatedly depended on our Bayliners in rough conditions, refutting them?


You've disputed, Bob; you haven't refuted. Look up the words.

What does it say
about you when you have to change the subject, and argue pointless
minutia by taking one sentence out of context within the entire
argument, missing the point of the entire argument with someone you
imply is your subordinate?



Beauty is in the details, Bob, no matter how minute.



I think I need to follow some good advice, end this thread, and get on
with my life. Feel free to take the last word, and live in the delusion
of your absolutism.



I'd be glad to grant you absolution, Bob, but I can't find my robe.




* * *
email sent to will *never* get to me.