On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:42:27 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 3/6/20 4:27 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 06 Mar 2020 16:05:14 -0500, Adorable Deplorable
wrote:

On Fri, 06 Mar 2020 15:28:37 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:36:42 -0800 (PST), Its Me
wrote:

https://palmettostatearmory.com/chinese-type-56-sks-7-62x39-military-surplus-rifle-w-spiker-bayonet.html?trk_msg=09EC6BI07IMKD2HIHO4T78I7G4&tr k_contact=3RKELVNMNKDUCJ2M6LBG5EUR34&trk_sid=VANVD HI90760LPTHDPA9J9J318&utm_source=Listrak&utm_mediu m=email&utm_term=https%3a%2f%2fpalmettostatearmory .com%2fchinese-type-56-sks-7-62x39-military-surplus-rifle-w-spiker-bayonet.html&utm_campaign=Daily+Deal+Email&utm_con tent=12%3a00+Email

Seems like it might be a decent price. I have no affiliation, it was just in my email.

That seems pretty high to me but I guess the imports slowed way down.

It's about $50 less than I can find it anyplace else on the 'net.

Still seems like too much for a crappy used Chinese rifle.


There are any number of new, really decent 7.62 x 39 rifles out there,
bolt action, not semi-auto. Ruger makes one that retails for under $400,
and a far better rifle than a crappy SKS. If you want a semi-auto, you
probably can find an AR upper in that caliber for $250-$300, and it,
too, will be a better rifle than the SKS.

The fixed magazine SKS might slip through some state laws if you take
the bayonet off. God know we need to stop this rash of bayonet charge
murders.