On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 16:38:04 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 13:16:46 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 11:36:26 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 06:14:55 -0400, John H.
wrote:

Mine's not Bluetooth, which may be why it works very well:

https://smile.amazon.com/Wireless-He...A3BT0DBLJQEM25

I notice that says "low latency", not "no latency". I guess the analog
to digital conversion takes some time. I am going to track down the
buffer size setting on my PC and see how low I can get away with. I
know my 900mz set seems to broadcast in real time but it is analog.
Going through the PC, I do have some latency if it goes through the
mixer but if it is set to "solo" it is straight through.

Whatever latency may exist is lower than my latency perception threshold.

I guess that is the advantage of generic 2.4 gz over Bluetooth, even
though they share the same basic bandwidth. I know I prefer my 2.4gz
Logitech desktop devices over the blue tooth ones I have. The only
advantage Bluetooth has is a resident hub in my laptops instead of
plugging in a dongle.


===

Have you noticed any latency difference with noise reduction turned on
or off?

Our Samsung "Smart TV" has an audio latency adjustment. I'm guessing
that they do it by delaying the video by some number of milliseconds.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com