Another ...
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			Mr. Luddite  wrote: 
 On 6/29/2018 3:42 PM, Wayne.B wrote: 
 On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:09:42 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" 
  wrote: 
  
 The only thing I can think of .... and this will cause indigestion for 
 many here ... is a required registration of all guns 
 and strict enforcement of the required registration.  If for some reason 
 you are found to be in possession of a firearm that is not registered to 
 you as it's owner, it results in immediate confiscation of that firearm. 
  
 === 
  
 The usual argument against mandatory registration is that in can be 
 seen as a first step towards confiscation.  That might seem ridiculous 
 to some but it has happened elsewhere, and it's very hard to put the 
 toothpaste back in the tube once the information and law is out there. 
 It would turn a large percentage of the population into law breakers, 
 sort of like prohibition and the 55 mph speed limit. 
  
  
  
 Australia is often given as an example after their mandatory buy-back 
 of firearms following the 1996 massacre in Port Arthur, Tasmania, where  
 35 people were killed.  Two buy-backs were conducted, one in 1997 and  
 the other in 2003.  The buy-back program also included new laws 
 governing gun ownership and qualifications with restrictions on  
 automatic and semi-automatic rifles, pump action rifles and shotguns,  
 stricter requirements for the registration of all firearms and  stricter  
 requirements for the storage of all firearms. 
  
 Here's what's interesting: 
  
 In the two decades following the reforms, the annual rate of gun deaths  
 fell from 2.9 per 100,000 in 1996 to 0.9 per 100,000 in 2016 yet 
 today, in 2018, there are more firearms privately owned in Australia 
 than there were before the buy back programs and tightening of firearms  
 laws. 
  
 That may suggest that the number of guns didn't make the difference. 
 It was getting the unregistered, unaccounted for guns out of the 
 hands of people that probably shouldn't have them and then being 
 more particular about who can own a firearm moving forward following 
 the buy backs. 
  
  
 
He murder rate barely changed.  Knives and clubs became a whole lot 
predominant. 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |