Thread
:
Carver boats - a big mistake?
View Single Post
#
2
posted to rec.boats
John H.[_5_]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Carver boats - a big mistake?
On Sun, 3 Jun 2018 00:03:07 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
On Saturday, March 18, 2000 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, Richard C. Belanger wrote:
Hi:
I have been looking at a new Carver 396. Looks like a nice boat, good
for the family, though not a hard-core offshore design. Everything has
been looking good until I went to
http://www.yachtsurvey.com
David Pascoe has a post on Carver's that makes me feel I would be better
off lashing together some logs than getting a Carver. Needless to say I
am more than a little concerned.
He points out major problems in the fabrication of Carver boats - and
essentially says they are unworthy of any consideration.
We have been comparing Carver's to Maxum and SeaRay and have liked the
Carver's better - partly because they seem to be more solidly put
together. Some friends who have newer Carver's and cruise them heavily
have also had good things to say about the seaworthiness of the boat.
I hadn't considered the more hard-core boats like Bertram and Hatteras
since I believed they were completely out of my price range.
Any opinions out there? Would I be making a huge mistake with a
Carver? Should I just keep saving for a better quality boat? My
primary goal is cruising the boat in Massachusetts waters - based out of
Boston.
Thanks,
Rich
The titanic hit a ice burg and sank, how big of a rock should anyone hit. Try not to hit anything but if you do be prepared.
Wonder if that boat is still floating?
Reply With Quote
John H.[_5_]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by John H.[_5_]