Keyser Soze
- hide quoted text -
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:18:04 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:02:00 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/26/18 3:11 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:21:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/26/18 1:16 PM, Bill wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/26/18 12:43 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:37:09 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/26/18 12:57 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:01:23 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/25/18 1:59 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:57:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Tim wrote:
Way to go, Rahm!
https://reason.com/archives/2018/04/...-cars-innocent


Nice way to use a right-wing site to **** on Chicago. Good job.

Why do you thing that is a "right wing" site? Granted they worry about
personal rights and government abuse of them but so does the ACLU. In
this case it is the CPD screwing over another black guy. I would think
you thought that was wrong. I bet if it happened in Montgomery you
would be ready to march or something.


It's a "libertarian" site, ergo, right-wing.

You really do not understand what a Libertarian is do you? I support
supporting the constitution and human/civil rights is a "right wing"
issue to you.
I bet you also think supporting the right to choose, marriage equality
and ending the drug war is a right wing issue too.
Amazing.


Yeah, you probably buy that libertarian nonsense, but the reality is
that libertarians are Republicans. If they want to win federal office,
they run as Republicans. If it looks like ****, smells like ****, and
acts like ****, it is a Republican.

... and democrats are communists. so what?

The fact remains that libertarians separate themselves from the
righteous right on virtually everything but you are to blind to see
that.


Separate but equal...libertarians elected to national office run as
Republicans.


Well, since the debates eliminated anybody not running as a Republican or
as a Democrat.


Oh, that must be it. OK, name the libertarians who ran and won federal
office...U.S. Senate or House...as Libertarians and not as Republicans.

We just explained it to you. The system is rigged and they won't let
anyone not a R or a D play the game. After Harry Browne and Ross Perot
embarrassed Bush and Clinton so badly, nobody can even get into the
show.


Bull****.

I am not surprised you feel that way but it is certainly true Perot
and Browne asked the embarrassing questions in that debate. Bush and
Clinton were just reciting their stump speech, over and over again,
whether it was responsive to the questions or not and the moderators
were letting them get away with it. After 96, 3d parties were not
allowed in the debates anymore and they became nothing more than
regurgitated campaign rhetoric with no serious questions at all.

The thing that did come out of that was some of the very real
questions about the debt, caused the Gingrich revolt in 94 and the
attempt at a balanced budget for a few years.
Since then, it has never actually been a serious topic and we never
see the numbers that Perot had developed to explain the problem.



Perot was a crackpot politician.

A crackpot calling the pot black. Wow.

Have you tried Tim's crockpot recipe, crackpot?


Whatever his business smarts, Perot was a political crackpot.
- show quoted text -

,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Wow Harry. Looks like your filters aren’t too good or Johns posts are really transparent. I thought you had him blocked?