On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 19:09:04 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/26/18 6:59 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:46:47 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:01:40 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/26/18 3:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:58:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/26/18 12:43 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 06:37:09 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/26/18 12:57 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:01:23 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/25/18 1:59 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 10:57:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Tim wrote:
Way to go, Rahm!
https://reason.com/archives/2018/04/...-cars-innocent


Nice way to use a right-wing site to **** on Chicago. Good job.

Why do you thing that is a "right wing" site? Granted they worry about
personal rights and government abuse of them but so does the ACLU. In
this case it is the CPD screwing over another black guy. I would think
you thought that was wrong. I bet if it happened in Montgomery you
would be ready to march or something.


It's a "libertarian" site, ergo, right-wing.

You really do not understand what a Libertarian is do you? I support
supporting the constitution and human/civil rights is a "right wing"
issue to you.
I bet you also think supporting the right to choose, marriage equality
and ending the drug war is a right wing issue too.
Amazing.


Yeah, you probably buy that libertarian nonsense, but the reality is
that libertarians are Republicans. If they want to win federal office,
they run as Republicans. If it looks like ****, smells like ****, and
acts like ****, it is a Republican.

... and democrats are communists. so what?

The fact remains that libertarians separate themselves from the
righteous right on virtually everything but you are to blind to see
that.


Separate but equal...libertarians elected to national office run as
Republicans.

That is simply because the system is rigged and you can't run as any
kind of 3d party.


More likely, it is because most Americans view the Libertarians as
crackpots.

Tell me true, would you rather have Trump or Gary?


Neither. Both are unqualified, and for at least two of the same
reasons...ignorance and intellectual laziness.

I think Johnson was better than Trump and certainly better than
Hillary. The idea that Johnson is stupid or lazy is contradicted by
his record in New Mexico.


He was ignorant and lazy during his presidential campaign...he had no
knowledge of important facts and he didn't bother to cram.

Cram for what? The amount of exposure he was allowed to get was not
worth much cramming. If he had perfect answers for everything we would
not have seen him at all. He got more press from blowing the Aleppo
question than anything else he could have done. The lesson of Trump's
campaign was not lost on him. There is no such thing as bad press.