Keyser Söze Wrote in message:
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 10:15:33 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 4/17/18 9:03 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/17/2018 8:53 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/17/18 8:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:


Since we have been on the subject of Hannity ....

Yesterday his name came up in court as being a client of Cohen.
It immediately became "Breaking News" on MSNBC and they spent
the rest of the day speculating on what it means.

Later, Hannity released a statement regarding his relationship with
Cohen.

Questions:

!. Do you know what Hannity said in his statement?
2. If so, do you believe him?
3. If no, why not?





I heard the broadcast of Hannity about his relationship with Cohen and
I read the transcript.

I don't believe him.

Cohen is not the sort of lawyer you would call about legal questions
or problems. He is the go-to guy, though, to handle some of Trump;s
slimy business deals or to "take care of" a girl you're ****ing or you
got pregnant.


To my knowledge, Cohen is still a lawyer and is licensed to practice
law. Please correct me if I am in error.

So, like a good progressive liberal you have condemned him without any
evidence. Figures.



I never claimed or implied Cohen was not a lawyer. Lots of lawyers have
said that Cohen is not much of a lawyer and no expert on the law. He is,
however, the go-to guy if you are in trouble with a woman, eh?

So you have actually looked up his cases and know what he has filed?
Interesting, can you give us a link?
If it was really important enough I suppose I could get my son in law
to do a Lexis search but I won't bother him for Harry ****.


He has had three clients recently. I?d bet any filings from Cohen fall
under the purview of fixer.

--
Posted with my iPhone 8+.


Oh wait. It appears that Fat Harry is the schlemiel. May he rot in
wherever they dispose of dead athiests.
--
x


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/