On 4/11/2018 7:59 AM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 6:52:22 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/11/2018 7:06 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:56:14 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

No surprise you fellas are in the dark regarding the many criminal
enterprises of Trump and Son and Sons.

None of them seem to be about the allegations of election collusion
with the Russians and that is what Mueller was supposed to be
investigating. What in the hell does a 12 year old one night stand
with a prostitute have to do with anything? (even if it was a
"freebie")


Are you again suggesting that if in the course of investigating one set of
allegations, evidence of other crimes are discovered, those other crimes
should be ignored?

And, again, it isn’t the sex...it’s the coverups and the possible
violations of laws right before an election. Try to keep up, eh?



A "payoff" to go away isn't illegal.

If there's a violation of a campaign law, i.e. using campaign funds
to make the payoff ... that's a possible violation, although a minor one.

BTW ... With regard to the Russian oligarch who you recently pointed out
made a $150K donation to the Trump campaign ... you neglected to point
out that the same Russian oligarch made a $25 million donation to the
Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Sec of State.

WOAH!



No kidding. Putting political party bias aside for a moment and just
looking at the issue of "fairness" the accusations made regarding
Trump's past pale in comparison to those of Hillary's. If a special
prosecutor was ever appointed to investigate her activities in public
office and as a candidate for POTUS, the investigation team would have a
field day finding evidence of criminal corruption.

I have a hunch that many political IOUs are being called as due to
prevent that from ever happening.