On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 12:31:31 -0700 (PDT), Its Me 
wrote:
On Friday, March 30, 2018 at 12:26:49 PM UTC-4,  wrote:
 On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 09:26:13 -0400, Keyser Soze 
 wrote:
 
 On 3/30/18 1:59 AM,  wrote:
  On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:20:55 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
   wrote:
  
 
 
  Trump:  1
  Stormy: 0
 
  and a California judge, no less !
  
  What was the decision about. NBC had nothing on this tonight.
  
 
 Are you talking about the half hour network news show? Those shows don't 
 cover a lot. It certainly was covered on the NBC cable outlet, MSNBC. 
 Basically, the judge said it wasn't timely yet for Stormy's case against 
 the Trump goniffs to proceed. 
 
 I did not see it on the local or network show. I also did not see it
 in 2 hours of the CNN "newsroom". All they said was Trump was likely
 to be deposed and giggling about that. They had no reports about a
 setback in that case.
 I don't watch Cooper or Lemon.
 
 
 In another development, Trump's lawyer's 
 lawyer claimed Trump had no knowledge of the $130,000 settlement, which 
 is fake news believed only on Fox, by its watchers, and Luddite here.
 
 The legal opinions I have heard say it might actually be better if he
 did know but it really does not change the validity of the NDA. 
 I do feel bad for Stormy because she is the one who is going to get
 ground up in this case. I doubt the extra 15 minutes of fame she gets
 will cover her legal expenses and the breach of contract suit Trump is
 likely to win. I am still curious how she is getting along with the
 IRS. I bet Trump is telling them to lay back, just for the optics (if
 he has any influence at all) but they have a long memory and if she
 has not been declaring all of this money as income she will be in
 serious trouble. I doubt any of her legal expenses are deductible and
 all of that money, including the original buck thirty, is income. 
 The problem with the IRS "laying back" is that interest keeps piling
 up.
All she has to do is amend her filing before the IRS comes after her and she's good.  There's no doubt that one of her lawyers has already mentioned the matter of the money to her.
There is still penalties and interest on the Buck thirty from 2016.
Depending on how they want to rule on that, it could be up in 5
figures. It is yet to see how her 2017 and 18 will go.