On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 12:16:18 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 06:00:58 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 00:27:16 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a
Presidential election is not an impeachable offense

I have not seen any proof that the election was "fixed" in any way.

"So you say cooperating with the Russian government to fix a
Presidential election is not an impeachable offense - if it's
Trump? Note, you said it, not me. You're ****ing crazy."

Chopping as you did is a very poor practice.

I just questioned the "fixed election" part of your rant so we could
take your points one at a time.
When you preface an entire scenario on a lie, the rest does not rise
to the level of being taken seriously.
How was it "fixed"?
If you can't describe the "fix" the rest falls from it's own weight.



"If, as the left claims, Trump worked with the Russians
during the campaign and the results of that collusion
influenced the outcome of the election ... it still probably
is not an impeachable offense, much to the dismay of some of
your party members."

Luddite described the fix, not me.
Like I said, he's crazy.
What scenario? What's to fall of it's own weight?
You mean that he's crazy?
You can have your own opinion on that.

So now you admit the election wasn't "fixed"?
It is pretty clear that no election district has said a single vote
was altered and the count seemed to be pretty much uncontested. I am
not sure where the fix would be.
Was there some bull**** and backstabbing? certainly but it seemed to
be more on the DNC side. All the hacks/leaks did was inform the voter.
The DNC never denied any of it. Don't we want informed voters?
Well maybe not if the truth makes your candidate look bad.