On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 09:26:13 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 3/30/18 1:59 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 16:20:55 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:



Trump: 1
Stormy: 0

and a California judge, no less !

What was the decision about. NBC had nothing on this tonight.


Are you talking about the half hour network news show? Those shows don't
cover a lot. It certainly was covered on the NBC cable outlet, MSNBC.
Basically, the judge said it wasn't timely yet for Stormy's case against
the Trump goniffs to proceed.

I did not see it on the local or network show. I also did not see it
in 2 hours of the CNN "newsroom". All they said was Trump was likely
to be deposed and giggling about that. They had no reports about a
setback in that case.
I don't watch Cooper or Lemon.


In another development, Trump's lawyer's
lawyer claimed Trump had no knowledge of the $130,000 settlement, which
is fake news believed only on Fox, by its watchers, and Luddite here.

The legal opinions I have heard say it might actually be better if he
did know but it really does not change the validity of the NDA.
I do feel bad for Stormy because she is the one who is going to get
ground up in this case. I doubt the extra 15 minutes of fame she gets
will cover her legal expenses and the breach of contract suit Trump is
likely to win. I am still curious how she is getting along with the
IRS. I bet Trump is telling them to lay back, just for the optics (if
he has any influence at all) but they have a long memory and if she
has not been declaring all of this money as income she will be in
serious trouble. I doubt any of her legal expenses are deductible and
all of that money, including the original buck thirty, is income.
The problem with the IRS "laying back" is that interest keeps piling
up.