On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:37:07 -0500, Keyser Soze wrote:

On 1/22/18 12:31 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:30:29 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 22:44:03 -0500, wrote:


We watched some rugby in New Zealand "Go All Blacks" and I agree it is
not exactly like soccer but more like it than NFL football. The
biggest single difference is no line of scrimmage.

We must be talking different sports. If soccer players hit like rugby players, they'd all be 'red
carded' off the field. Other than the requirement to move the ball downfield, I can't see many
similarities between soccer and rugby. Between rugby and football, yeah. You said it in your last
sentence.

Most of the violence in football is within a few yards of the line of
scrimmage. That is why they have different rules there. You have a
half dozen 300 pound guys on each side, lined up face to face snarling
at each other and on the snap they crash into each other as hard as
they can, on every play. They are not even allowed to grab each other,
they have to just knock the other guy out of the way. What could
possibly go wrong? Compared to that a scrum is just a big group hug.



I went to a rugby match last fall and saw the game was not much
different than when I was in college, back before electricity was
discovered. It's a rough and tumble game, for sure, but I didn't see any
Neanderthals lined up to kill or maim each other, nor anyone taking
anyone down as it is done in football. No extra violence. Pro football
is going to be sued out of existence, and the sooner the better.

You saw no tackles, eh? Must have been a girls rugby match. Either that or your bull****ting again.