Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/12/17 1:35 PM, Tim wrote:
Its Me
- show quoted text -
No, not in any sense.

"It is widely recognized that the attributive use of the noun Jew, in
phrases such as Jew lawyer or Jew ethics, is both vulgar and highly
offensive. In such contexts Jewish is the only acceptable possibility.
Some people, however, have become so wary of this construction that they
have extended the stigma to any use of Jew as a noun, a practice that
carries risks of its own. In a sentence such as There are now several
Jews on the council, which is unobjectionable, the substitution of a
circumlocution like Jewish people or persons of Jewish background may in
itself cause offense for seeming to imply that Jew has a negative
connotation when used as a noun."

Some folks just want to be offended, or are looking too hard for offensive things.

——

Though the Italian settlements in St. Louis is now called “The Hill” to
be politically correct, nobody is ever offended if you ask where “Daygo
Hill” is. That’s where the family eating establishments are. “Daygo
Hill”. Gotta love it.



The pejorative is "Dago," not "Daygo." Crikey.


Maybe Tim was trying to be a little PC.