BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Bill[_12_]

Keyser Soze wrote:
On 11/23/17 1:41 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 12:30:03 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 11/23/17 11:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:10:36 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/23/2017 10:44 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:24:19 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:39:43 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:51:50 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

Just like Weiner. take the guy out. There's no call for this...None!

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-selfie-259442

So he sent a nude selfie to his girlfriend. So what? I honestly
don't see it as a big deal.

===

Exactly. Poor judgement perhaps in a digital age, but not a big deal.

Exactly. The days of the one off polaroid picture are over. These days
any picture you take could easily end up on the internet and be copied
a million times. Don't take any pictures you don't want on TMZ.

I was just watching a couple of attorneys talking about Barton.
In their opinion the ex-girlfriend could be subject to a misdemeanor
charge in Texas, with up to a year in jail and/or a $4k fine.

There are laws in some states about doing this if
you can prove that you had a reasonable expectation of privacy.

If it is actually illegal in Texas I think a civil suit might be more
devastating for the leaker. It would be easy to prove far more than
$4k in damages.
I really have mixed emotions on this because sending the picture was
the Acme of foolishness in the first place.

But...have we heard from the holier-than-thou evangelical christians
about sending photos of a penis to women?

All of them here seem to agree its disgusting and downright stupid.

But child molestation is ok, according to some evangelical preachers in
Alabama.

100 years ago, 14 was married age.