Danny Taddei wrote in message ...
Oz1 wrote:


I'm sure Sir Peter Blakes widow would agree. He was shot because he
pulled a gun, no gun, no dead hero, just an insurance claim to replace
some electronics.


Oz1...of the 3 twins.
I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

Well I'm not sure because i don't remember the name but there was an old
couple about 1994-5 in panama that anchored off of a prison island and
were boarded by some escapees... they leave these people to walk the
island- you'd have to be a fool to anchor there in the first place - and
when they were boarded the old man pulled a gun and told them to stop.
he did not fire. he was killed in the process. Is this the man you are
talking about?

You are obviously of the weaker mindset and would never be welcomed
aboard my ships. Down unders laws against guns proved that if you don't
have guns you get more crime.

[snip]

Nothing of the kind. The most you can say is that there is no
relationship between laws restricting gun ownership and a decrease in
crime. That's a lot different from saying that laws restricting
ownership cause more crime. Still, I expect subtle points of
statistics are beyond your comprehension. They seem to be beyond Oz's
as well, but that's not news.

I've owned firearms all my life and am entirely capable of building my
own if I want to, so don't give me any of your macho crap. A real
human being is one who treats his/her fellows with the same courtesy
and respect as they wish to recieve. People like you are slowly
getting culled out of the gene pool and not before time either. You're
a waste of time & space. I can't imagine why any sensible person would
want to be on one of your dinghies. Not more than once, anyway.

Peter Wiley