posted to rec.boats
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,553
|
|
Very interesting outlook on the transgender military ban...
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 7/31/17 11:08 AM, Justan wrote:
John H Wrote in message:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 00:38:27 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 20:22:32 -0400, Keyser Soze
wrote:
I'm sure the 20,000+ sexual assaults of women military personnel in 2014
were committed by gay men, right?
If you actually read past the headline you would know it said 7
percent of military women and 2 percent of men experienced some sort
of "unwanted sexual contact".
Were the people harassing the men, women or were they gay guys?
...or transgendered gay women/guys.
Or gay women harrassing straight women.
Or if more men would ante up we wouldn't have to enlist wives and
mothers to fill the gaps.
I was about to post that your comment was your dumbest ever but, in
reality, pretty much every post of yours is your dumbest ever.
The solution lies in more training, more discipline, and more
prosecution. Women are entitled, literally, to serve in the armed forces
if they wish. I doubt it impacts on readiness, as our military forces
haven't taken on and defeated a serious, disciplined, well-equipped
opposing force since WW II and you can't blame our failures on women.
Blame the generals...they're in charge.
Blame the politicians, they are the actual ones in charge.
|