On 5/30/17 10:00 AM, Tim wrote:
8:35 AMKeyser Soze
- show quoted text -
Well, I think your "take" on the headline of the article in question is
incorrect. I thought the headline was inquisitive and neutral.
...

Harry, you're probably correct about it, but "John Q. Public" looks at it as being guilty of "something" and it doesn't matter what.

Also it's a question not a headline, which leads to a false pretense of guilt or a wrong doing.

False narrative?


I question whether "John Q. Public" reads any serious newspapers,
whether the paper or the on-line edition.

My take and the take of my seriously liberal friends is that there is no
evidence generally available -yet- that says that Donald Trump has
committed any serious crimes since the election, although there are
suspicions he has obstructed justice. Can't say the same for some of his
high-level staffers. Trump has said a lot of really stupid things and
has taken some horrific actions, but...these are political decisions,
and not criminal.