View Single Post
  #23   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Keyser Soze Keyser Soze is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,424
Default Carrier Strike Force 1 ...

On 4/10/17 10:00 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/10/2017 9:27 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/10/17 6:48 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/9/2017 8:53 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 8:05:50 PM UTC-4, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/9/17 5:38 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, April 9, 2017 at 3:41:33 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
... consisting of the Aircraft carrier "USS Carl Vinson" a guided
missile cruiser and two or three DDG's are on their way to a
station off
the Korean coast. They were en-route to Australia for a port call
but
were ordered to reverse course and steam towards Korea. Not
reported
but a carrier strike force usually also includes at least one nuke
sub.

The North Korean nutcase Kim Jong-un must be having a **** fit.

I'm sure the escort is more than a sub but you know its there and
what else is anyone guess. well, except for Harry, he seems to know
more than the Pentagon. At least here he does. LOL



The question is whether Kim Jong-un is any more of a nutcase than
Donald
Trump, who might just well start WW III. A really good deal-maker,
instead of Bull**** Artist Trump, might have been able to persuade
President Xi to go back home and convince his government to put North
Korea on a short leash. But noooo...we have an ill-informed, lazy,
ignorant, short-termed idiot as president.

The last president drone-bombed 7 countries. Now one precise strike
is going to start WWIII with what you liberals call his buddy?

You are delusional.



It's because the term "drone" is not offensive to progressive liberals.

They are already complaining and protesting that "Tomahawk" is offensive
to native Americans.




Jackoff didn't realize I was discussing the two nutcases, the POTUS and
the leader of North Korea, I suppose. I wasn't talking about Trump's
attack on Syria. You obviously pay a lot more attention to "progressive
liberals" than I do. I haven't read a peep of complaint about the
Tomahawk descriptor.

By the way, all liberals are progressive.



I don't think so but it's my personal view. There are some moderate
liberals that I wouldn't label as "progressive". To me, progressives
are liberals who are intolerant of other views and have an elitist,
"enlightened" attitude. It starts with most college professors who
indoctrinate/brainwash their students with their politics.

The complaints about "Tomahawk" being used as the name for our cruise
missiles was on the news last night and this morning.

You were probably cleaning your guns.



No, I was at the gym. The only thing on the TVs there are awful videos
telling you about the horrific diseases you'll get if you eat
good-tasting food, date pretty girls, and fail to exercise.