On 4/4/2017 8:01 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/4/17 7:55 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/4/2017 7:53 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 4/4/17 7:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/4/2017 6:57 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 4:21:00 AM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/3/2017 8:14 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 7:22:04 PM UTC-4, Alex wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:

Does Rachel Maddow ever change her clothes?

It occurred to me the other day that for as long as I can
remember seeing her on MSNBC she is always wearing the same,
black, gender neutral "suit".

Is there some liberal symbolism here?

She apparently has a gray version, too:

https://www.google.com/search?q=rach...1536&bih=6 58





Gawd she's ugly, and annoying too.


I can only handle a few minutes of her repeating the same points,
over
and over and over.

I know, that cn get old. Harry does the same thing. over..and
over...and over...



It's a progressive liberal thing. If you keep repeating the same BS
over and over and over eventually it becomes "true".




You mean, like religion?

Pretty much. The progressive liberal agenda *is* a religion to them.


Really? I'll have to ask some of my more progressive liberal friends. Of
course, liberal implies one favors progress, as opposed to conservative,
which has come to mean **** everyone except the rich and the white.

You really have a warped understanding of what conservatism means. But
that's understandable. BTW, it's not the "liberal" part of progressive
liberal that implies progress. It's the "progressive" part of the
label. Problem is, progress in the wrong direction isn't progress at
all. I tried to make that point in another post recently. In many ways
today's progressive liberals are pushing to return to big, oppressive,
centralized government ... the same type of governance that existed
before the American Revolution, Declaration of Independence, the Bill of
Rights and the Constitution.