On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 07:44:50 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 1/23/2017 6:20 AM, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/22/17 1:34 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 12:27:13 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
8:31 AMPoco Deplorevole
https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...88&oe=59028A1F


or: http://tinyurl.com/hyt5zxh

Just think, without Facebook we'd never have seen such wisdom.
.....


Makes sense to me. I wonder how many of those people actually voted?

It's just a bunch of malcontents who wanted a woman, any woman, in the
white house. They would have settled for Hilly even with her
scandals, lies, and crookedness. Simply because she is a woman.

If they had a cogent message it might have been more convincing. As it
was, it was simply flailing about, and life will go on.




You boys are pathetic and scared. Last Saturday's demonstrations in DC,
across the United States and around the world made a strong statement
against Trump and the horrors for which he stands. Trying to knock the
demonstrations and a few of the demonstrators is I suppose all you
really have. Hopefully the demonstrations turn into active civil
resistance.

As more honest news releases of the "demonstrations" come out, the more
people are realizing that the protesters really didn't have a unified
message at all. It was a hodgepodge of different "issues" that were not
necessarily inter-related. The event is turning out to be more of an
embarrassment than anything else for the anti-Trump, liberal cause.

Crap ... I was in the Navy for 9 years but some of the signs and
costumes held or worn by female demonstrators made *me* blush. :-)

I heard the story again today that a lot of these women already had
the tickets, for a Hillary victory party and they decided it was
better to demonstrate than to eat the tickets.
Once they had that core on the street, disgruntled democrats like
Harry were easy to attract.