On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:56:39 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 1/22/2017 1:34 PM, Its Me wrote:
On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 12:27:13 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
8:31 AMPoco Deplorevole
https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...88&oe=59028A1F

or: http://tinyurl.com/hyt5zxh

Just think, without Facebook we'd never have seen such wisdom.
.....




Makes sense to me. I wonder how many of those people actually voted?

It's just a bunch of malcontents who wanted a woman, any woman, in the white house. They would have settled for Hilly even with her scandals, lies, and crookedness. Simply because she is a woman.

If they had a cogent message it might have been more convincing. As it was, it was simply flailing about, and life will go on.


I agree with you. The reason for the high gain reaction is because it
was assumed that Hillary had this election in the bag, even up to
election night when the returns first started coming in. Harry was
predicting a "significant" victory by Hillary and thought the Senate
could very well go Democratic as well. A lot of people were fooled,
including me.


Hillary was not even on the list of Women's March honorees.

http://people.com/politics/hillary-c...on-washington/

Apparently she wasn't very well thought of.