On Saturday, January 14, 2017 at 9:39:02 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/14/17 9:17 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Saturday, January 14, 2017 at 8:57:22 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/14/17 8:50 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Saturday, January 14, 2017 at 8:40:27 AM UTC-5, Keyser Soze wrote:
On 1/14/17 8:35 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 05:29:57 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 1/13/2017 11:35 PM, RGrew176 wrote:
Mr. Luddite;1074809 Wrote:
I've been doing some research on smaller trucks to replace the F-250 I
have now. The main criteria is something that Mrs.E will feel
comfortable driving (meaning smaller) yet still has the tow capacity to

handle the little camper she bought last summer. Ideal would be a tow
capacity of 5K to 6K lbs to tow the little 4K lb. camper.

I happened to be looking at the Tacoma and recalled you posting that
yours is rated to tow 6,400 lbs. You also have said you have the four
cylinder, 4x4 with a manual transmission.

You might want to verify your tow rating for that configuration.
According to Toyota, it is only rated to tow 3,500 lbs. (2016 model
specs).



To bad you can't wait until 2019. Ford has a new Ranger pickup coming
out then. A new Bronco is coming out in 2020 and the F-150 will be
getting a 3.0L Powerstroke diesel in 2018. I think down the road that
3.0 diesel will find its way into other Ford products such as the
Ranger, Bronco, Expedition and Explorer.

Is that when the new Ranger is debuting? I'd actually like to wait and
see because according to the press release I saw it will be a
"mid-sized" truck. I really liked the Ranger as did a lot of other
people. You certainly see a lot of them on the road. The problem is
that I am not so sure her Mountaineer will last that long. She uses it
a lot and it has about 175K miles on it now.

The only bad experience I've ever had with Ford products was the 2005
F-350 diesel (6.0L) and it's problems were all related to the
International engine. If those problems hadn't existed I'd probably
still be driving it now.


If you and several others hadn't had so many problems with that diesel engine, I'd probably be
driving a Ford now.


You want problems, expensive problems, you should buy an Audi.

How would you know? You don't own one. Based on a sample size of one that a friend owns?

I've had two, and my second one has needed *nothing* in the way of maintenance other than oil changes. Maybe you should stick to what you know. What is that, other than being an asshole and 7th grade attempts at insults?


A close relative owns one. It spends a lot of time in the shop with its
over-engineered systems breaking down.

As I said, a sample size of one. I've actually had experience with four... my two, and two that my wife had from her previous job where cars were provided to the executives. They were all very reliable, with virtually no time in the shop. All vehicle have lemons from time to time. You're experience isn't indicative of the world.

"Improvement is possible. Audi, once described by Consumer Reports as "a sinkhole of service problems," is now the top-ranked European brand in the magazine's annual reliability rankings. Audi, which is one of several Volkswagen (VLKAF) luxury brands, has improved greatly over the last few years, according to the report."

Maybe your relative just has an old, worn out one.


So, it has improved from being a sinkhole... to being the top-ranked European brand in the magazine's annual reliability rankings.

That makes you wrong... again.