|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2016
Posts: 649
|
|
Serious question about Russian hack
Califbill wrote:
Alex wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/31/16 9:17 PM, Alex wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
On 12/30/16 7:47 PM, Alex wrote:
Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...
I confess to being a little torn on this. Not sure how I feel.
For the sake of argument, I'll stipulate that Russia was responsible
for hacking into the DNC email accounts and Hillary's campaign
manager's
account. Let's agree that the hacked emails were then made
available to
Wikileaks, as most claim.
For a while some Hillary supporters were suggesting that not only
were
the emails hacked but Russia also changed some of the wording in
them to
make matters worse for Hillary. Those claims died though after
copies
of the original emails were found on Anthony Weiner's laptop that he
shared with his wife.
So, what really caused Hillary to lose the election? I am
certainly not
advocating Russian hacking of personal emails but the act of hacking
isn't what caused her to lose. It was the content of the emails
that
caused her to lose.
Nothing to be confused about.
The Russian hackers had nothing to do with HRC's loss. They revealed
nothing but common politics and gossip.
The news media's drumbeat of HRC "corruption," and hammering her on
her
private State Department server, and Comey coming up with "new
emails" -
which weren't - made enough Bernie voters stay home.
The stupid voters came out, and carried the day for the pussy
grabber.
It was the lowest turnout sine 1996. It was Stupid Day, 2016.
Bitter, Kevin?
Well, no one is going to accuse you of being clever...about anything.
This isn't a comedy club.
Sure it is. You deplorables are hysterical.
Fantastic response!
Look what happened to the last person calling people deplorables.
Unemployed.
And, likely, unemployable. Think she will be a draw on the speaking
circuit?
|