On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:51:16 -0500, Keyser Soze
wrote:

On 12/20/16 10:35 AM, Tim wrote:
Not pizza. That's a different deal. Anyhow, let em eat cake, eh?

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015...efy-the-order/


Perhaps it is because "gay" is something "genetic," such as skin color
or age, and therefore cannot be changed and it is illegal to
discriminate, whereas, if you are an asshole Republican Trump voter,
well, you have a choice about that.

Must really bother you to know that certain forms of discrimination are
not allowed, eh? Perhaps your fearful leader Trump will take us back to
the 1950s.

It is simply a question of what the civil rights act of 64 says and
"gay" is not a protected class. As soon as you start expanding that
definition into unspecified areas the definition is lost, legally.
Scalia is right, the law is what it says it is, not what people may
think it is. That is why it is dangerous to start legislating from the
bench. You are allowing 5 people to make law instead of simply
enforcing it. The courts can say a law is unconstitutional but they
can't write law. That is the job of the legislature.