BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Califbill

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/8/16, 1:07 PM, Califbill wrote:
Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says...

On 11/8/16, 5:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/7/2016 9:39 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:17:36 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

Comey never said HRC lied to Congress. That makes you a a low-down
liar.

He never said she "lied" but he did say some of her testimony was not
true.

Semantics. She testified under oath. Comey said that some of her
testimony was not true. How can you make specific statements under oath
that are not true and not be lying?

The above has been brought to you by the Save the Lemmings Foundation.

Wow...an argument about semantics from posters who do not believe in the
value of those danged "liberal arts." Language and its usage are, of
course, part of the liberal arts.

"How can you make specific statements under oath
that are not true and not be lying?", you ask.

Easy. Facts may be interpreted differently. I'd give examples but, heck,
this is rec.boats. What difference does it make?

You're talking to a known liar. He specifically said that Comey said HRC
lied to Congress. That's a damned lie. Specifically.
Besides, if Congress if affronted they can have the DOJ file charges
under 18 U.S.C. §1621 ? perjury and 18 U.S.C. §1001 ? false
representations before Congress.
I ****ing dare them to do it.

The FBI can not have DOJ file charges. They can recommend, but you have a
DOJ who does not want to thwart Hillary as POTUS.

Doubtful but on the other hand, we have an FBI director who is in the
bag for Trump.

Even if they recommended prosecution would fall through the Lynch cracks.
Maybe that is what the private meeting with Bill was concerning. Maybe she
will get a couple million buck speaking engagement.