Thread
:
House Questions Comey
View Single Post
#
2
posted to rec.boats
Boating All Out
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,401
House Questions Comey
In article ,
says...
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 02:27:59 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:
Couldn't lay a glove on him.
"No evidence warranting prosecution."
And he wouldn't even go so far as to say Hilary couldn't join the FBI due
to previous "careless" handling of classified material.
Not that makes any difference, seeing that Hilary doesn't want that job.
Pretty much trashed the Republican calls for prosecution, and gave the
house a schooling on the law.
Of course the Hilary witch-hunt will continue, because that's what
Republicans do.
Now, the question is to vote for Hilary, or Trump.
It's a no-brainer, but that's assuming a brain is present.
Well, I'm throwing down my cards.
Hilary 2016!
Did you ever think your cards would come down any other way?
Sure. It might have been Bernie. Certainly not Trump.
Now I know the alternative to Trump. Hilary Rodham Clinton.
I do believe you were not listening to Comey's testimony and only saw
what MSNBC cherry picked out of the hearings.
I watched the entire hearing. CSPAN. But MSNBC had the entire hearing,
as did CNN.
Comey refused to engage the Republicans in whether HRC would be hired by
the FBI - as if that could happen.
He also refused to to talk about Condi Rice and Colin Powell since he
wasn't charged with investigating them. Lucky for them.
Powell used his AOL account for SoS business, and said so.
Condi Rice - we'll never know. It's probably all been deleted.
BTW, it's now 2016. Congress's is still using private accounts to
conduct gov business.
As I said above, Comey's decision was not to prosecute.
In case you weren't paying attention, he explained it thoroughly.
Reply With Quote
Boating All Out
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Boating All Out