On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:07:43 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/7/16 4:02 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:45:49 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:


I don't have any problems voting for Hillary.
Of course not, You would vote for Al Sharpton if he was the democrat
candidate.

There isn't a Republican
on that list of 17 I would have voted for, under any circumstances, for
many reasons.

Me either. The closest might have been Kasich but he is still an empty
suit



I certainly would vote for The Rev. for POTUS before I would vote for
any of the Gang of 17.

BTW, did you catch this exchange:

MATT CARTWRIGHT: You were asked about markings on a few documents, I
have the manual here, marking national classified security information.
And I don't think you were given a full chance to talk about those three
documents with the little c's on them. Were they properly documented?
Were they properly marked according to the manual?

A lot of the things the SoS does will not even get a security
classification until after she does it. She is supposed to know the
difference. That is why diplomatic cyphers are supposed to be the most
secure of any in the government. There is no indication that she was
ever using any encryption at all in spite of being in places with very
sophisticated state actors trying to spy on America. Wannabe ISIS guys
in California are smarter than her.

I don't believe she was malicious or even criminal, just "extremely
careless", "negligent" and "sloppy".
Unfortunately she also lied about it under oath, assuming she is not
just too stupid to know what should be a state secret.

That certainly calls into question, her ability to be the president.