|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
|
|
Meet Mrs. Clinton, the new corporate whore.
On 7/6/16 10:12 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 9:30:25 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 9:15 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 8:19:56 AM UTC-4, Tom Nofinger wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:03:48 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/6/16 7:52 AM, Its Me wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 7:46:03 AM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 10:47 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:13:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
I'd vote for Biden. Maybe I will anyway.
If he is not the DNC candidate, you might as well vote for Johnson, as
if it really matters in your state.
Pimping for the Libertarians again, those fellas who are Republicans who
care even less about, for example, the right to not be the subject of
discrimination?
"Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever
standards of association they deem appropriate." Don't want to serve
blacks, gays, Jew, Catholics in your restaurant? Fine with the Libertarians.
You're being idiotic. A restaurant is *not* a "private organization".
D'oh.
Hehehe. You must have missed Rand Paul's comments about the ability to
discriminate, built upon Libertarianism.
Reminds me of a comment I read this morning...but I doubt you'll get it.
Someone said "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI
director said she was careless. Donald Trump is clueless."
You're a Trump voter, right?
A liar like Hillary. Krause, your quote goes nowhere. From the Google search engine:
Your search - "I'd rather vote for Hillary even if the Republican FBI director said she was careless ... - did not match any documents.
And his "quote" above about "members of a private org..." doesn't match anything according to google either. Why is he making this BS up?
Bottom line is his made-up quote doesn't indicate that a public restaurant should be able to select their clientele. Libertarians do believe a private club should be able to, like a country club does, or like a local group of the black panthers. Or even like a moderated shooting or boating group does. Heh.
Thus, proof is once again provided that there are intellectual ciphers
among us who think that if they can't google it, it doesn't exist,
because google has everything. D'uh.
Here's a hint for you, JackOff...the "members of a private organization"
quotation is found in the "platform" of the Loonytarian Party. Perhaps
you can figure out how to google that.
Get back to us with your findings.
Read for content, asshole. While google didn't return any hits for that entire statement that you posted, it's your interpretation of its meaning that I'm calling BS on. You know, when you tried to stretch the meaning of "private organization" into "restaurant".
Besides, we all know your propensity to selectively edit cut-n-pastes to suit your agenda. The fellows in here have caught you at it several times in the past. That's just one reason most folks believe very little of what you post.
I didn't post an entire statement, just a fragment. And my
interpretation is no different than Libertarian Rand Paul, who
enunciated the Libertarian belief in the right to discriminate.
You're a yawner, JackOff.
|