On Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 11:26:32 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/5/16 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:35:57 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 7/5/16 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 04:44:39 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...rump-business/

If you don't think that could be, you may want to stay tuned.

The Clintons have always been corporate whores.
How do you think they went from zero to over $150 million in 15 years?


D'uh. Obviously, the answer is to disqualify from seeking office anyone
who has ever had any corporate ties or even contributions from
corporations.

You certainly should be questioning $750,000 honorariums for a man
who's wife is the SoS and the corporation is doing international
business that State is signing off on. The Saudis have funneled
millions into super pacs that endorse here. It is "hold your nose"
legal but certainly should raise red flags.
If anyone but Trump was running against her, she would be deader than
disco.
Comey just came out today and said "Scty Clinton was "extremely
careless in handling highly classified information", "Information was
properly classified as 'top secret, special access only' at the time
it discussed on E-mail". He pointed out that her server was not even
as secure as G-mail.
"It is possible that hostile actors gained evidence to her E-mail
account"
He went on to say they found a ****load of undisclosed "work related"
E-mails that were not turned over and that they made an intentional
effort to wipe as many devices clean as they could. Unlike commercial
"private" E-mail servers, nothing was archived. If they deleted an
Email and it was not still spinning in the slack space of the drive,
it was gone forever.
Conclusion "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes"
He went on to say criminal prosecutions for these things is not likely
BUT that there are generally "administrative sanctions".
She may not be prosecuted at this time but the FBI calls her
"extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly
classified information"

That doesn't sound very presidential to me.

I think they should put all the dice back in the cup at BOTH
conventions and find 2 new candidates,


There will be no indictment, but you can still hope for one charging
Hillary with planning and directing the multiple shooters on the grassy
knoll back in Dallas in 1963.

Of course there was no indictment, Krause. However there was probably a load of damage slated in Trumps favour.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politi...ebar_expansion