On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 06:35:10 -0400 (EDT), justan wrote:

Alex Wrote in message:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 6/17/16 7:43 AM, justan wrote:
Wrote in message:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:46:37 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:21:04 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/16/16 12:10 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:06:33 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 6/16/16 11:52 AM, Tim wrote:


2) if you're meaning the CZ is a more accurate rifle than the
10/22
then you should reconsider.


Why? The stock CZs under discussion are more accurate than the
10/22s.

The issue is whether the shooter is more accurate than the gun.


That's Tim's issue. Some firearms are inherently more accurate than
others. You should have watched the little video I referenced.using
ope
About a minute into the ad, I didn't care anymore.
opeThe caption says it shoots inside a 1/2 MOA but most shooters
can't
accomplish 10 times that without a rest and a scope.


The guy was using a rest and a scope. I doubt a 10/22 could match
that at
100 yards no matter what.

So what?
Most people do not sit at a bench with a scoped rifle trying to shoot
tight groups all day, particularly with a 22 rf.




Most folks would be happy if they hit what they are shooting at.
There might be some advantage to hitting the target at different
points.



I'm happy that I can shoot offhand and hit a target the size of your
belly button at 20-25 yards.

You are exaggerating, I'm sure.


Do ya think?

I think he pokes holes in the target with a pencil, photographs same, and posts it to get pats on
the back.