On Mon, 9 May 2016 13:00:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 5/9/16 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2016 10:51:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 5/9/16 10:42 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2016 07:22:43 -0700 (PDT),
" wrote:



I did not know Wayne was supporting Hillary.

===

The reality is that Wayne has no dog in this hunt and intensely dislikes both candidates. Of the two Hillary might well be the lesser evil but it would certainly pain me to vote for her. It would be nice to have a half way viable 3rd party alternative.

This may be the best opportunity for that in over 100 years when the
3d party got 11 times the number of EC votes as the republican. They
still lost in a landslide to Wilson.
The first world war started in his administration, pretty much over
nothing.



A government hater like you would like the resulting chaos, in which no
candidate got the required 270 EC votes and the election was tossed into
the U.S. House, where the controlling Repugnants selected a
bible-thumping teabagger.

No thanks.

Would you rather have Trump?


Than a bible-thumping teabagger? Tough q uestion.

It would have to be someone who had a significant number of votes in
the general election (in the top 5) so I am not sure which bible
thumper would be in the running.
I suppose it all comes down to whether there are any viable 3d party
candidates but it is clear the presumptive D and R candidates are
both very unpopular.