Is this what they are protecting?
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:17:13 -0700 (PDT), Its Me
wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 9:51:26 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:27:13 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:
All the recent political and social commotion about transgender people
and bathrooms is even sillier when you look at the numbers. How many
trans people have been arrested for sex acts in bathrooms? As best as we
can tell, zero.
I think they just posted 2 (peepers) but there are plenty of women who
are uncomfortable with men in the ladies bathroom, no matter how they
are dressed. I am married to one and she is as gay friendly as anyone.
The fact remains that the majority of cross dressers are not gay. They
are not really transgender but once you open this can of worms they
will exploit the opportunity, if just for their own gratification.
Maybe your wife can explain it to you.
It's amazing that these idiots don't think there's going to be a problem when you start allowing the opposite sex in the bathroom.
The rule is simple: You have junk, you go to the men's room. No junk, you go to the ladies room. If that stresses you out, you go see a mental health pro, not a legislator.
I suppose the real answer will be more "family" rest rooms where both
sexes are accepted. They are "one holers".
The reality is, a lot of places have unisex one holers now anyway. It
stops the suits about bathroom inequity where the number of mens vs
womens does not match the perceived need
|