On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:22:48 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:42:57 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I'm a pragmatic voter and would gladly accept either of the Democratic
candidates as POTUS. The Republican alternatives are unaccepable.

That is not pragmatic, it is simply pulling the rooster.
If you can rationalize Hillary and Bernie, it is clear you are not
doing anything but following the party line or you do not really
understand who they are.

In the most fundamental issues, they are polar opposites

Then he isn't following the party line, or has different
"fundamentals" than do you.

He definitely just follows the party line. If you are as much against
the big corporations, wars and income equality as Harry professes to
be, you are a Bernie person. If you just want another 4 years of the
Bush administration you are a Hillary person, yet Harry can go for
either with equal fervor.

Pretty sure Harry can distinguish Democrat from Republican,
while you apparently can't.

I am not convinced there is a real difference unless you are talking
about Bernie and he is actually an independent who is just piggy
backing on the democrats because the Greens will usually only get on
80% of the ballots and the Socialism & Liberation party is lucky to
get 30%.