On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:32:01 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:14:44 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:03:28 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:01:08 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Yup. And if you go with a Burris sight, they have dedicated mounts for the Mark III. They do make some really nice looking Mark III's. I already have a more traditional Mark I that I shot when I was a kid with my father. I wanted the unique features the 22/45 had.

Hush, damnit! I need reasons *not* to buy the damn thing!

===

I might be willing to sell mine if you're really interested. There
are red dot sights much less expensive than the Burris and just as
good in my opinion.

http://www.amazon.com/Ohuhu-Green-Reflex-Sight-Reticles/dp/B00YRIHYIW

You're willing to sell your what? Gun or sight? Does that sight mount directly to the
gun?

===

The weaver rail attaches to the top of the receiver, and the red dot
sight attaches to the rail. It also has Hogue target grips, 5
magazines and a removable Volquarsten compensator. It shoots well but
I subsequently had a chance to buy a really nice customized Hi
Standard that I like even better.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=ruger+iii+compensator


Didn't know what the Volquarsten compensator was, so looked it up. Some funny
comments he

http://rugerforum.net/ruger-rimfires...tor-mkiii.html

Do you still have the original grips? Did installation of the rail require removal of
the factory sights?

If you got my email of the other day, drop me an email at that address with how much
you want and pics if you have any.

===

Yes, I still have the original grips stashed away somewhere in my
copious collection of "stuff". The rail does not require removal of
the factory sights. When I get a chance I'll find everything, take
some pix and send you an EMAIL.

Take your time. I'm in no rush. And, thanks.
--

Ban liars, tax cheats, idiots, audiophools, and narcissists...not guns!