On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:50:42 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 3/1/16 12:38 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 20:36:14 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:


Obviously your reading comprehension skills are about as bad as
CalifBill's, and you will be voting for Trump in the general.



Your debate skills suck. Interesting, is how low the Democrats are turning
out for the elections. Tells us, that not many are enthused about Hillary
and Berni.

Harry debates just like Trump. It is all "you are stupid, I am awesome
and I don't need to tell you anything else".

Ironic isn't it. I still say if Trump was running as a democrat, Harry
would love him.


Your political naivete never fails to astonish. The current iteration of
Trump could never find success running for the Democratic nomination for
POTUS and, of course, I couldn't support a pig like Trump under any
circumstances.

You just said it "The current iteration of Trump".
He could just have easily came out of the box as the other Trump and
been a democrat. He has plenty of liberal history, including endorsing
Hillary and giving her money.

You seem to support the "The current iteration of Hillary" but it is
easy to point out that she has not always shared your views and her
views seem to be very fungible, depending on who's money she is trying
to get. Why won't she release transcripts of those speeches she was
giving to the banksters for six figure fees? Is it like that Romney
video that got leaked?

I really seem to be the only one here who is skeptical of the campaign
rhetoric. Maybe it is because I am willing to admit when I was
betrayed by a person I voted for. You Clintonistas are still in denial
every time they screw you and say "thank you sir, may I have another"