On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 19:19:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/27/15 4:41 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 16:34:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/27/15 1:42 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 14:00:21 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/26/15 1:57 PM, wrote:

I will keep this in mind the next time you are griping about a 10
commandments rock in front of a city hall somewhere in Mississippi and
tell us how it is infringing on your rights.


Such a display infringes on everyone's rights.

Any more than a gay rights parade with guys in ass chaps or an art
gallery with religious symbols in ****?

You are really talking about the right to not be offended and the same
article you cite says that right does not exist.



And once again, you demonstrate a lack of understanding of the issues...

And once again, you demonstrate what happens when you're backed into a corner.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!



Corner? Because I understand the establishment clause and not many here
do, and that a gay rights parade on a city street has nothing to do with
the clause?

You refuse to actually read the words. How can you say the state of
Mississippi did anything the "establish" christianity? As I recall it
was thriving for at least 1500 years before the white man ever
ventured there?
That article also says "Congress shall make no law". Congress was not
involved at all.
I find it ridiculous that people will parse words and invent ways to
restrict the meaning of "the right of the people to keep and bear
Arms, shall not be infringed" in the second amendment but apply the
most generous interpretations to the words in the first, actually
making up things that it doesn't say.