On 11/15/15 3:42 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 2:07:58 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 2:35 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:23:48 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 1:14 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:11:08 PM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 12:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 8:33:30 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Say what you want but can, or will you prove it wrong?


Prove what? That the guy whose site it is is a convert to some sort of
christianity and has no particular "cred" on islam in China?

content Harry, content. can or will you disprove the article?


There are all sorts of non-religious sites that describe the status of
islam in china.

As for prove or disproves, here's one for you:

Prove the fellow you believe is your savior is the son of god.

And naturally, in your abstract way of "answering" questions. "What does that have to do wtth the article or it's author?


It displays the level of your logical reasoning processes. You are
willing to believe a negative screed about Muslims in China when there
are many legitimate sites that state the opposite of what your religious
convert claimed.


What "legitimate sites you talking about?

And, you are also willing to believe in the existence
of a "creator" and the alleged son of that creator without a shred of
tangible evidence proving either.

ZZZZzzz

Hey, believe whatever you like on your religion, but obviously your
beliefs on at least parts of the real world have been shaped by Fox
News, spurious sites like the one you cited, and their ilk.

How perceptive of you Harry. I've had my religious beliefs before Fox News was ever thought of.



I was commenting on your non-religious beliefs.