On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 06:20:33 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 01:52:47 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 16:31:12 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 10:58:36 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 07:09:49 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/14/15 12:29 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:59:09 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

Keyser Söze wrote:
John H. wrote:
...or juvenile delinquents.

Maybe the threat will be taken seriously.

And, doesn't France have some very stringent gun control laws? Shame someone in the
concert wasn't carrying.

French borders closed. Should tell us something.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


This isn't the time for your right wing insanity.


Maybe not time for left wing insanity. Let a bunch of "refugees" from
Syria, etc. in?

France is lousy with militant muslims. It has been that way for a
while, certainly since the 50s when they had their "Algerian" problem.
Things are just heating up.
I think we ain't seen nothin yet. These terrorists have infiltrated
most of western Europe, hidden in with the refugees.


Other than our deserting Israel, what's your Libertarian idea for
handing ISIS?

Let Putin do it. The only reason any of those groups threaten us is
because we are bombing them.

It has nothing to do with our choice of religion?

Only when we are promoting it in their country.
The jihadis who attack "infidels" in other countries are just nuts who
have become radicalized on the internet, not unlike the other mass
killers we deal with.

I think as long as we, and allies, have an issue with Iran over nuclear weapons, we
provide a rallying cry for the extremists. For us, and allies, to 'back out' would be
to put nukes in the hands of Iran very shortly. I have no doubt that ISIS could get
their hands on same soon after. If these kids in the sand box are left alone, they'll
build some very dangerous toys.

Then what?

Iran is fighting ISIS,
I understand it is sometimes hard to keep who is fighting whom
straight ;-)
ISIS is more closely related to our good buddies the Saudis.