View Single Post
  #111   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
John H.[_5_] John H.[_5_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default What could be nicer...

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 22:47:47 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:01:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

So it should be illegal to fly a drone over a neighboring farmer's field? Or would it
only be illegal to fly over his back yard? And if the question is privacy, how would
you know whether or not the drone had a camera? Or a first person view capability?

The mission of the FAA is 'is to provide the safest, most efficient aerospace system
in the world.'

Drones flying over back yards at low altitude pose no threat to the safety or
efficiency of the aerospace system.


The function of the FCC is to regulate the airwaves and make sure we
have the orderly use of the bandwidth but they got involved with Janet
Jackson's nipple. It is just the nature of federal agencies.


Janet's nipple was not an orderly use of the bandwidth. That was absolutely gross. A
Taylor Swift nip slip, on the other hand, would have been quite orderly.

(Hope that's not racist!)
--

Ban idiots, not guns!