On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:43:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/10/15 8:33 AM, John H. wrote:

Show them some of the videos with the injuries. That'll bolster their 'self-defense'
case. Besides, it seems like buckshot would be pretty hard to trace.
--

In many parts of the country, you cannot discharge a firearm in your
backyard, even if you are trying to shoot down an annoying, intrusive,
privately owned drone that is hovering.


I had some interest here in my water cannon idea, originally proposed
to shoot at "no wake" violators. Think Bellagio fountains.

What's needed is some sort of "disruptor" electronic device that would
simply cause the nasty little devices to crash in your yard, so you
could pick them up and stuff them in the trash can.

That could bring you FCC troubles. There are simply too many things
running on 2.4gz


We have a couple of kids in the neighborhood who fly their planes and
drones over an empty lot that has become a sort of ad hoc playground.
Perfectly acceptable.

Since most of the interest surrounding drones is the camera capability
I suspect aerials of an empty lot would get boring pretty quickly.
This is not like the joy of watching your model of a vintage plane
flying around.