BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

Keyser Söze

wrote:
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:15:01 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 15:52:28 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:09:33 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Monday, November 9, 2015 at 11:49:59 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 06:22:41 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 22:25:23 -0500, wrote:

OK you win, they are flying death machines but I think I would keep it
to myself if you like flying them ;-)

We're flying machines that could hurt a bird (or a human for that matter)!

If you say that out loud about the ones the FAA considers hobby
machines, get ready for much more regulation.

There have been plenty of people hurt, and a couple that I know of
killed, by RC airplanes over the years. That has not driven any
regulation. The whole problem with the new "drones" (more properly
quadcopters, drones are sophisticated military killing machines) is
that they can be flown nearly anywhere by anyone with the cash to buy
one and with minimal skills.

The RC hobby was, and still is, almost entirely self-regulated since
the skills to fly an airplane or heli are slowly learned, require
assistance, and require a sizable area in which to learn and fly.
That almost always means there is a club with its rules and regs, and
the requisite membership in a RC organization that provides landowner
and member insurance coverage.

Unfortunately the proliferation of inexpensive gyro stabilized
quadcopters with cameras, coupled with a few ignorant assholes that
have bought them and use them improperly, has driven proposed
regulation that may affect large groups of very safety conscious,
responsible RC hobbyists.

I understand that but RC planes are to drones as ham radio is to CB

Say what?

One is a well disciplined group and the other is a rabble.

Is that on the latest SAT?

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+