On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 01:22:02 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 11/5/2015 9:26 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 6:28:18 PM UTC-6, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 14:45:08 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

John, I think the 850t was the same engine as the old Eldorado with slightly larger valves, carbs, and maybe a hotter camshaft but not sure if that. At least the cam part. It was a great rock solid engine that was perfect for their sport format which they didn't really have...yet

Even that old 850T would leave Harleys in the dust in the twisties.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

That's one thing about European motorcycles. They were build for handling. My 500 Triumph Daytona, was quite the dancer but light. The Ambassador was much heavier but regardless, it was really nimble.



The bigger Harleys were never designed for handling or to be "fast".
They are designed for highway cruising with a bit of comfort.

Other than a couple of small Hondas when I was young (a 305 "Super Hawk
and a Honda 350), the motorcycles I had were all Harleys .. a couple of
Softails and a couple of Ultra Classics. Then, about 5 years ago, I
acquired a completely restored 1974 Norton 850 Commando. (I traded a
1965 Volkswagon mini bus for it). I rode the Norton twice ... to the
guitar shop and back. Not for me. A Norton is a young man's bike, not
an old fart used to big, fat Harleys. I sold it to a Norton collector
who still rides it.


Ah a "Snortin Norton" We had one with a cracked jug ear we got pretty
much for free. I knew a guy with a "heliarc" shop who was able to weld
it and ground it down so it looked normal. We put it back together and
got a grand for it. I'm with you, not my kind of bike.