On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 12:14:13 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/2/15 12:06 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:20:15 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/2/15 11:15 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:15:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

Reality Sucks
Leading GOP candidates aren’t at war with the press. They just have a
problem with the truth.

It is true that CNBC, which is supposed to be a business channel, did
not ask that many economic questions.
It is also true that none of these press conferences can be called
debates because there is very little actual interchange between the
candidates.

I asked before and didn't really get an answer from you. Are the
democrats going to let Fox moderate one of their debates?
Your brain fart was along the lines of "if the GOP can't deal with
NBC, how will they deal with Putin". I could say the same thing about
the Democrats and Mygan Kelly or Hannity


Why should the Dems bother with Fox or its audience? There's nothing to
gain.

So you admit these debate "moderators" are biased?


Uh, no.

My response was clear. The Dem wannabe's do not need Fox or its audience
to be nominated or elected. There is nothing to be gained by the Dems
"debating" on Fox, so why waste the time?

The Repugnants, apparently, think they need exposure to networks other
than Fox. I don't know why. Their ship of fools seems intent on sinking
itself. I can't wait for Rubio to be questioned closely about his fairy
tale life. That'll leave who, Cruz?

Delicious.

Just the fact that you admit networks can be biased makes my point.
We really need the fairness doctrine back.

You would change your mind if the Kochs decided to buy NBC and Time
Warner.