On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:09:12 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article kevn0bpvnq8s70ge7u3duafipok2btcis6@
4ax.com, says...


It wasn't even close. Maybe you should look at the abstracts of the 2
bills.


You mean like this one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affordable_Health_Care
_for_America_Act

It only proves you're wrong, but I already know that.

I love it when you guys post a link that says exactly the opposite of
your position.

From the wiki
referring to the house bill that was tossed in it's entirety
"The central changes that would have been made by the legislation, had
it been enacted, included the following:"

.... and goes on to list 2 pages of things the house bill had that were
not in the senate bill.

Do I really have to get the Thomas list of actions on the bill for you
guys AGAIN?
The first thing that happened after the bill was read into the senate
was it was totally replaced.
I trust the Library of Congress a lot more than a wiki writer who does
not understand how congress works.


I still ask, where is this "leadership"?
For the last 7 years, just about everything has come down to straight
party votes. That is not leadership, it is simply standing still and
letting party affiliation decide everything for you.

It took "leadership" and drive to get the Dems
together to pass the ACA, a monumental
accomplishment.

Leadership would have been to get some republicans on board.

They are just preaching to the choir.