On Sun, 06 Sep 2015 13:31:35 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 06 Sep 2015 11:40:34 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 08:39:08 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/6/15 1:34 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:43:54 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/5/15 7:31 PM, amdx wrote:

He's all set to get probation if he testifies truthfully.

Mikek

D'oh. Do you even know what "taking the Fifth" means? Probably not.

The way prosecutors get around the 5th amendment is to grant immunity.
Then there is no incrimination and failure to testify is contempt of
court.


Gosh, really?

I am curious what Hillary's in house geek has to hide.

===

If they can catch him in some kind of technical law violation, that
can be used as a bargaining chip to turn him against Hillary. They
will play hard ball with him if they can find an opening.

That is always the game of chicken they play with immunity. If he has
immunity and then says it was all his doing, nobody else knew what he
was doing, everyone walks.
It is always better if they know what they are immunizing him from
before they move.
Like the old adage says, never ask a question you don't already know
the answer to.
That is really best when it is a perjury trap.